For all and none, isn't there a difference (pas de differAnce) between
Foucault's nonmessianic ethic of freedom and Derrida's ethic of decons-
truction after all? I suspect the latter still sounds the glas of messianic
remains--despite all claims to nonpositiniong vis-a-vis the boundaries of
the political... An anarchic kingdom of sorts isn't it bound to sovereign
subjectivation of the will to power? Perhaps the new philosophers of to-
morrow (and the day after tomorrow) will be better liers and laugh at their
own truths with cynicism and without shame. N.
Foucault's nonmessianic ethic of freedom and Derrida's ethic of decons-
truction after all? I suspect the latter still sounds the glas of messianic
remains--despite all claims to nonpositiniong vis-a-vis the boundaries of
the political... An anarchic kingdom of sorts isn't it bound to sovereign
subjectivation of the will to power? Perhaps the new philosophers of to-
morrow (and the day after tomorrow) will be better liers and laugh at their
own truths with cynicism and without shame. N.