Why don't we just read and discuss Foucault -- we are already
sufficiently anonymous -- and is language not a sufficient mask?
Rolland
On Thu, 21 Mar 1996, Joe Cronin wrote:
> I have another procedural suggestion for this discussion; in
> fairness to Foucault, and in the spirit of "What does it
> mean to be an author?" and a number of other comments he
> makes, why don't we write our comments anonymously, and get
> rid of all egological interference? We could all be
> floating in cyberspace, discussing Foucault (maybe we don't
> need to mention his name, either).
>
>
------------------