More acid! This illustrates the problem with e-lists - we never really know
who are the good guys. Can anyone please explain to me (perhaps off-list)
why all this acrimonious stuff is being posted?
Colin Holmes
>Tom, We were curious about the extent of Albrightian hogwash we can expect
>on this list. Does this superfluous hornblowing continue for the duration
>of an attempted close reading and discussion, or will the foul winds die
>down at some point?
>What other lists and readings have been infected, I'd be curious to see
>how this virus was taken care of by searching the archives...........
>Earl Messer & Deanna McGaughey
>On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, TOM DILLINGHAM wrote:
>
>> The Foucault list is getting a characteristic flavor of the inimitable
>> hogwash dished out by Randall Albright. Enjoy, folks, as he works
>> his destructive juju on yet another list.
>> Tom Dillingham
>>
who are the good guys. Can anyone please explain to me (perhaps off-list)
why all this acrimonious stuff is being posted?
Colin Holmes
>Tom, We were curious about the extent of Albrightian hogwash we can expect
>on this list. Does this superfluous hornblowing continue for the duration
>of an attempted close reading and discussion, or will the foul winds die
>down at some point?
>What other lists and readings have been infected, I'd be curious to see
>how this virus was taken care of by searching the archives...........
>Earl Messer & Deanna McGaughey
>On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, TOM DILLINGHAM wrote:
>
>> The Foucault list is getting a characteristic flavor of the inimitable
>> hogwash dished out by Randall Albright. Enjoy, folks, as he works
>> his destructive juju on yet another list.
>> Tom Dillingham
>>