Did I miss something? I never read Foucualt condemning heterosexuality, if anything at
all. He just tried to uncover hidden historical meanigns, isn't this what geneology is all
about?
erik
Vunch@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In a message dated 5/21/00 3:28:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << I recall that Charles Taylor made his contribution
> some time ago, with his radio talks and booklet. He called Foucault some
> kind of a devil
> (proving he didn't know where he was talking about) and his motives were
> clearly to make
> the pope more popular. >>
>
> Taylor objected to Foucault's condemnation of heterosexuality and embracement
> of bisexuality, or was Foucault nothing but a homosexual?? Foucault makes a
> point if he is condemning heterosexism, but otherwise his argument is
> evolutionary suicide.
>
> Fred W.
all. He just tried to uncover hidden historical meanigns, isn't this what geneology is all
about?
erik
Vunch@xxxxxxx wrote:
> In a message dated 5/21/00 3:28:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << I recall that Charles Taylor made his contribution
> some time ago, with his radio talks and booklet. He called Foucault some
> kind of a devil
> (proving he didn't know where he was talking about) and his motives were
> clearly to make
> the pope more popular. >>
>
> Taylor objected to Foucault's condemnation of heterosexuality and embracement
> of bisexuality, or was Foucault nothing but a homosexual?? Foucault makes a
> point if he is condemning heterosexism, but otherwise his argument is
> evolutionary suicide.
>
> Fred W.