>So because there are homophobic laws, homosexuality is immoral? What the
>FUCK are you talking about??
>
>Here we see why Kant is truly a fascist.
>
Could we please make arguments instead of just reciting
dogmas? Kant was deffinitely not a facist, seeing as facism
didn't exist then. Also, you cannot use heteronomous arguments
to attack Kant, just as he didn't use them when formulating
moral metaphysics. You haven't told us what is wrong with
homophobia other than it is "facist." I'm not saying either way
I'm just saying we should debate instead of screaming dogmas
to drown out reason.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>FUCK are you talking about??
>
>Here we see why Kant is truly a fascist.
>
Could we please make arguments instead of just reciting
dogmas? Kant was deffinitely not a facist, seeing as facism
didn't exist then. Also, you cannot use heteronomous arguments
to attack Kant, just as he didn't use them when formulating
moral metaphysics. You haven't told us what is wrong with
homophobia other than it is "facist." I'm not saying either way
I'm just saying we should debate instead of screaming dogmas
to drown out reason.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com