Even by the self account of the folks who put that dictionary together
repeatedly say the "good" lays outside of fact. "Good" to whose
account?
Jivko Georgiev wrote:
> Maybe. But the good in it is the idea for Foucault
> dictionary.
> --- Hansdao@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > This dictionary is fraught with error and
> > misinformation!!
> >
> > Hans Skott-Myhre
> > University of Minnesota.
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
repeatedly say the "good" lays outside of fact. "Good" to whose
account?
Jivko Georgiev wrote:
> Maybe. But the good in it is the idea for Foucault
> dictionary.
> --- Hansdao@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > This dictionary is fraught with error and
> > misinformation!!
> >
> > Hans Skott-Myhre
> > University of Minnesota.
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/