Is this criticism valid or are the criticisms an indication that Foucault
has been elevated to messianic proportions and we are seeing the formation
of schisms and denominations?
Lionel
>From: Sissy <sissy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Even by the self account of the folks who put that dictionary together
>repeatedly say the "good" lays outside of fact. "Good" to whose
>account?
>
>Jivko Georgiev wrote:
>
> > Maybe. But the good in it is the idea for Foucault
> > dictionary.
> > --- Hansdao@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > This dictionary is fraught with error and
> > > misinformation!!
> > >
> > > Hans Skott-Myhre
> > > University of Minnesota.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
has been elevated to messianic proportions and we are seeing the formation
of schisms and denominations?
Lionel
>From: Sissy <sissy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Even by the self account of the folks who put that dictionary together
>repeatedly say the "good" lays outside of fact. "Good" to whose
>account?
>
>Jivko Georgiev wrote:
>
> > Maybe. But the good in it is the idea for Foucault
> > dictionary.
> > --- Hansdao@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > This dictionary is fraught with error and
> > > misinformation!!
> > >
> > > Hans Skott-Myhre
> > > University of Minnesota.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.