As I said before, put down that Whiskey bottle and start READING A BOOK in
order to SUBSTANTIATE your "idea".
Your comments about the English race (what the hell do you mean by race)
approximate the most senseless gibberish that's been presented on this list.
Try to THINK before you write. Reading philosophy is not just about taking
some nice little quotes out of context and mashing them up in your favourite
cocktail. It is a BRAIN-based activity.
Yves
On 07/09/01 8:28 Uhr, "Lionel Boxer" wrote:
> I don't think my comments are paranoiaic at all. They do not worry me if
> that is what you are referring to ... rather they explain why the English
> created the State of Isreal. They saw it as their duty to make it happen.
>
> In an article about Gadamer, Outwaite (in Skinner (1985, p. 24)) explains:
> 'This notion of projection tends to be misunderstood in the Anglo-Saxon
> world as a mysterious kind of empathy, but what Dilthey (1958) and others
> really had in mind was a much more cerebral process based on a common sphere
> of experience.
>
> This Masonry was indeed a common sphere of experience and the English did
> not (and perhaps still do not) 'know what they do does', to quote another
> idea of Foucault. If a whole nation attend monthyly meetings that reinforce
> the notion that Jews are meant to be in Isreal then they will gain
> satisfaction in seeing that take place.
>
> Just an idea. Not paranoiaic.
>
> After reading a bit of Foucualt, I get the feeling that the English race
> does not understand alegory to the same degree that the French and Russians
> do.
>
> ---------------
> guillame debord <guydeborder@xxxxxxxx>
> Some of those things that you are saying are quite
> parnoiaic. Very good and nice, I like that mad
> critical nuts which reads things into those weird
> movements de la passe!!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
order to SUBSTANTIATE your "idea".
Your comments about the English race (what the hell do you mean by race)
approximate the most senseless gibberish that's been presented on this list.
Try to THINK before you write. Reading philosophy is not just about taking
some nice little quotes out of context and mashing them up in your favourite
cocktail. It is a BRAIN-based activity.
Yves
On 07/09/01 8:28 Uhr, "Lionel Boxer" wrote:
> I don't think my comments are paranoiaic at all. They do not worry me if
> that is what you are referring to ... rather they explain why the English
> created the State of Isreal. They saw it as their duty to make it happen.
>
> In an article about Gadamer, Outwaite (in Skinner (1985, p. 24)) explains:
> 'This notion of projection tends to be misunderstood in the Anglo-Saxon
> world as a mysterious kind of empathy, but what Dilthey (1958) and others
> really had in mind was a much more cerebral process based on a common sphere
> of experience.
>
> This Masonry was indeed a common sphere of experience and the English did
> not (and perhaps still do not) 'know what they do does', to quote another
> idea of Foucault. If a whole nation attend monthyly meetings that reinforce
> the notion that Jews are meant to be in Isreal then they will gain
> satisfaction in seeing that take place.
>
> Just an idea. Not paranoiaic.
>
> After reading a bit of Foucualt, I get the feeling that the English race
> does not understand alegory to the same degree that the French and Russians
> do.
>
> ---------------
> guillame debord <guydeborder@xxxxxxxx>
> Some of those things that you are saying are quite
> parnoiaic. Very good and nice, I like that mad
> critical nuts which reads things into those weird
> movements de la passe!!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>