thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: <ColinNGordon@xxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Human rights
> This is not online but good - like Jim Tully's piece, informed by, rather
> than about Foucault:
> Thomas Osborne, What is neo-enlightenment? Human rights culture and
juridical
> reason, Journal of Human Rights, 2003, 2, 3
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
> This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
>
> Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
----- Original Message -----
From: <ColinNGordon@xxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Human rights
> This is not online but good - like Jim Tully's piece, informed by, rather
> than about Foucault:
> Thomas Osborne, What is neo-enlightenment? Human rights culture and
juridical
> reason, Journal of Human Rights, 2003, 2, 3
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
> This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
>
> Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>