It seems to me that there's a hefty ahsitorical element to Heidegger's Being
and Time analytic of Dasein which makes it inimical to Foucault, who sees
subjectivity as historically constituted in a much stronger sense than the
early Heidegger. At least that's what I'm arguing in my thesis at present.
Possibly there's a great answer to this in Stuart's book, but I've left it
at home.
On 7/11/04 21:46, "Kevin Turner" <k_turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Having slept on it, I'm inclined to agree with you. I too think that I am
> probably pushing things a bit too much here; especially the relation between
> Dasein and actualité. Maybe I inadvertently stumbled upon the limits to all
> of this when I noted that each is merely addressing a related question: what
> are we now!
>
> Regards - Kevin.
and Time analytic of Dasein which makes it inimical to Foucault, who sees
subjectivity as historically constituted in a much stronger sense than the
early Heidegger. At least that's what I'm arguing in my thesis at present.
Possibly there's a great answer to this in Stuart's book, but I've left it
at home.
On 7/11/04 21:46, "Kevin Turner" <k_turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Having slept on it, I'm inclined to agree with you. I too think that I am
> probably pushing things a bit too much here; especially the relation between
> Dasein and actualité. Maybe I inadvertently stumbled upon the limits to all
> of this when I noted that each is merely addressing a related question: what
> are we now!
>
> Regards - Kevin.