Re: [Foucault-L] Re: Foucault and Analytical Philosophy

Leon

How do you interpret Foucault on the difference between what he calls "énoncé" and "speech acts"?

Lionel

Lionel Boxer CD PhD MBA - 0411267256 - lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sustainability and leadership - see http://intergon.net
Victorian Scottish Regiment
NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSIT (none may attack me with impunity)
----------------------------------------------
Melbourne Volunteer Rifle Regiment 150th Anniversary -- http://intergon.net/rifles
Legion of Frontiersmen Centenary - http://intergon.net/frontiersmen
The Army Lodge 75th Anniversary Fri 3 Dec 2004 -- http://intergon.net/tal
----------------------------------------------

From: Leon Farhi Neto <leon@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Re: Foucault and Analytical Philosophy
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:24:23 -0300

_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list

Ben,

I'm reading <Archéologie du Savoir> by now.
In the chapter about statements ("énoncés"), Foucault writes
about statements level ("niveaux énonciatifs")
or statements relations ("relations énonciatives"),
which may remind the langage games
(sprachspiel) of Wittgenstein.

In this same chapter, Foucault works on
the difference between what he calls "énoncé" and "speech acts"
("a concept of english analytical philosophers..."),
a probable reference to Searle and Austin.

Leon

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
          Ben,<br>
<br>
I'm reading &lt;Arch&eacute;ologie du Savoir&gt; by now.<br>
In the chapter about statements ("&eacute;nonc&eacute;s"), Foucault writes<br>
about statements level ("niveaux &eacute;nonciatifs") <br>
or statements relations ("relations &eacute;nonciatives"),<br>
which may remind the langage games<br>
(sprachspiel) of Wittgenstein.<br>
<br>
In this same chapter, Foucault works on<br>
the difference between what he calls "&eacute;nonc&eacute;" and "speech acts"<br>
("a concept of english analytical philosophers..."),<br>
a probable reference to Searle and Austin.<br>
<br>
Leon <br>
<br>
<br>
Ben Sorgiovanni escreveu:<br>

<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midBAY102-F411A52BD653CAD2BD4A112DE490@xxxxxxx">Hi all,<br>
   <br>
I am interested in learning more about the influence that analytical<br>
philosophy had on Foucault and his ideas of power and discourse.&nbsp; In<br>
'Foucault and His Interlocutors', in the chapter entitled 'Structures and<br>
Strategies of Discourse', Davidson quotes Foucault:<br>
   <br>
"For Anglo-Saxon analytic philosophy it is a question of making a critical<br>
analysis of thought on the basis of the way in which one says things.&nbsp; I<br>
think on could imagine, in the same way, a philosophy that would ... bear<br>
rather on relations of power than on language games."<br>
   <br>
Davidson later cites Foucault's early engagement with linguistic philosophy<br>
and Wittgenstein in particular as evidence that Foucault's philosophy grew<br>
from influences that weren't purely continental.<br>
   <br>
I was wondering if anyone knew of any other statements by Foucault or<br>
otherwise, in which this relationship is discussed?<br>
   <br>
Cheers,<br>
   <br>
Ben Sorgiovanni<br>
   <br>
   <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Foucault-L mailing list<br>
   <br>
   <br>
</blockquote>
<br>

<pre class="moz-signature" cols="$mailwrapcol">--
Espa&ccedil;o Z Design
AGORA COM NOVO SITE
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.zd.com.br";>http://www.zd.com.br</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:leon@xxxxxxxxx";>leon@xxxxxxxxx</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:zdesign@xxxxxxxxx";>zdesign@xxxxxxxxx</a>
48 - 2230677

Esteja a&iacute;. Onde estiver.
--</pre>
<br>

</body>
</html>