I can also recommend the excellent work of Mariapaola Fiamini (This is the
french translation to an italian book), perhaps the most extensive work on
the relationship between Kant and Foucault.
FIAMINI, Mariapaola, *Foucault et Kant*. *Critique Clinique Éthique.*
L'Harmattan,
1998.
I would also recommend La vérité et les formes juridiques, (1974) Dits et
Écrits infra 139. (pp. 1406-1513 in the Quarto édition) in which Foucault
explain his position in regards to kantian epistemology.
It is also interresting to note that Lyotard's Kant and Foucault's Kant
share some similarities :
LYOTARD, Jean-François, *Le différend*, Éditions de minuit, 1983.
----, L'enthousiasme.* La critique kantienne de l'histoire,* Éditions
Galilée, 1986.
Jean-François
2006/2/8, Leon Farhi Neto <leon@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> In his text Foucault gives a very particular place to Kant's
> "Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht"
> – one of the latests books Kant published (1798) -
> in the totality of Kant's works.
>
> Foucault has translated this book into French and published it in 1964.
> Anthropologie du point de vue pragmatique. Paris: J. Vrin.
>
> When we read Kant's Anthropology we experience
> a strange feeling, since many passages seem to be
> contradictory with the critical texts, and Kant is not exactly
> the writer from whom we could expect contradictions...
> But those are not real ones,
> since the critical and the anthropological texts don't have the
> same reference. The man-subject of the Critics is not
> the same of the object-man of the Anthropology.
>
> In fact, Foucault identifies three irreducible domains in Kant's work:
> the Critics, the Anthropology and
> the incipient Transcendental Philosophy
> (which consists of some fragments in the opus postumum).
> They are irreducible (irréductibles) because
> this three domains cannot collapse one into the other.
>
> There is an excellent article (in Spanish)
> to understand the Foucault's thesis and its construction:
> GROS, Frédéric; DÁVILA, Jorge (1996): Michel Foucault, lector de Kant.
> 38 f.
> Venezuela: Consejo de Publicaciones de la Universidade de los Andes.
> Access: <http://www.comunidadandina.org/bda/ficha_bda.asp?registro=89>.
>
>
> Leon
>
>
> psicopr wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I´m very curious about the uses of the Secondary Thesis on Kant, after
> > the sharing of the text last year, and the posterior divulgation at
> > various websites. What do you think about the impact of the
> > argumentation of secondary thesis related with other texts (like
> > Histoire de la Folie, Le Mots et les Choses, and/or others)? What do
> > you think about the quality of the transcription?
> >
> > best regards,
> >
> > Marcio
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Search
> > Dê uma espiadinha e saiba tudo sobre o Big Brother Brasil.
> > <
> http://br.search.yahoo.com/search/news?p=bbb+OR+%22big+brother%22&ei=UTF-8&x=wrt&fr=intl-mail-br-b
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
french translation to an italian book), perhaps the most extensive work on
the relationship between Kant and Foucault.
FIAMINI, Mariapaola, *Foucault et Kant*. *Critique Clinique Éthique.*
L'Harmattan,
1998.
I would also recommend La vérité et les formes juridiques, (1974) Dits et
Écrits infra 139. (pp. 1406-1513 in the Quarto édition) in which Foucault
explain his position in regards to kantian epistemology.
It is also interresting to note that Lyotard's Kant and Foucault's Kant
share some similarities :
LYOTARD, Jean-François, *Le différend*, Éditions de minuit, 1983.
----, L'enthousiasme.* La critique kantienne de l'histoire,* Éditions
Galilée, 1986.
Jean-François
2006/2/8, Leon Farhi Neto <leon@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> In his text Foucault gives a very particular place to Kant's
> "Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht"
> – one of the latests books Kant published (1798) -
> in the totality of Kant's works.
>
> Foucault has translated this book into French and published it in 1964.
> Anthropologie du point de vue pragmatique. Paris: J. Vrin.
>
> When we read Kant's Anthropology we experience
> a strange feeling, since many passages seem to be
> contradictory with the critical texts, and Kant is not exactly
> the writer from whom we could expect contradictions...
> But those are not real ones,
> since the critical and the anthropological texts don't have the
> same reference. The man-subject of the Critics is not
> the same of the object-man of the Anthropology.
>
> In fact, Foucault identifies three irreducible domains in Kant's work:
> the Critics, the Anthropology and
> the incipient Transcendental Philosophy
> (which consists of some fragments in the opus postumum).
> They are irreducible (irréductibles) because
> this three domains cannot collapse one into the other.
>
> There is an excellent article (in Spanish)
> to understand the Foucault's thesis and its construction:
> GROS, Frédéric; DÁVILA, Jorge (1996): Michel Foucault, lector de Kant.
> 38 f.
> Venezuela: Consejo de Publicaciones de la Universidade de los Andes.
> Access: <http://www.comunidadandina.org/bda/ficha_bda.asp?registro=89>.
>
>
> Leon
>
>
> psicopr wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I´m very curious about the uses of the Secondary Thesis on Kant, after
> > the sharing of the text last year, and the posterior divulgation at
> > various websites. What do you think about the impact of the
> > argumentation of secondary thesis related with other texts (like
> > Histoire de la Folie, Le Mots et les Choses, and/or others)? What do
> > you think about the quality of the transcription?
> >
> > best regards,
> >
> > Marcio
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Search
> > Dê uma espiadinha e saiba tudo sobre o Big Brother Brasil.
> > <
> http://br.search.yahoo.com/search/news?p=bbb+OR+%22big+brother%22&ei=UTF-8&x=wrt&fr=intl-mail-br-b
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>