Adriano,
I thank you for your reply. It is very useful indeed. He says somewhere else that he is not a philosopher (page 249 of the Ethics edited collection, I think. bad notes, sorry!!). Very odd. I wonder if this is Foucault being bashful under the burden of anticipated critique?
By "nietzschean thinker" do you mean in respect to his historical methodology as a "genealogical descent" or with regards to time (event vs eternity) do you mean a thinker of the untimely? I guess that is asking almost the same question twice...
What is remarkable is the use of 'scene' in the title of the piece. It is only superficial of course and entirely coincidental, but half my dissertation is organised around thinking about an event-based conception of the "scene" within a particular strand of popular culture. More in the concrescent sense of an event than in the discontinuous (structuralist) sense. I use it as a hinge to mediate between the historical events (in Foucault's sense of eventalization) and the contemporary present day sense of the scene (within which I insinuated myself through fieldwork).
Ciao,
glen.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Adriano" <oxanairda@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] DE 234 article?
Glen;
You are refering to "La scene de la philosophie", april 1978 (where M. Watanabe interviews Foucault) It is important to remark that F doesnot describes himself as a philosopher. As far as it is shown on the spanish translation, F says that his is interested in the event, not in eternity, and thats what doesnot make him a philosopher in the classic way, or maybe not even a philosopher at all, or a good philosopher. I think that this statement is rather diferent to say that he is putting himself as a philosopher, but that doesnot mean either that he is putting himself as something else than a nietzschean thinker. Those days F was very careful to take some margins about himself (i could bet that by that time he noticed that he was somehow sick) and other philosophers (to me it sounds that he was taking distance about Deleuze, but not in a combative way: on contrary, to say that D is not like hime, that he is really a philosopher -remarking that he (i mean F) is not"-, but
this sounds not as a "victim discourse", F ment that)
Cheers and forgive my broken english
adr
----- Mensaje original ----
De: Glen Fuller <gfuller1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Para: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Enviado: lunes, 22 de enero, 2007 20:06:04
Asunto: [Foucault-L] DE 234 article?
hi,
does anyone have the reference for the dits et ecrits publication #234? or
know if it has been translated into english? according to the 'event' entry
in the "key concepts" glosssary in clare's book (2005, _michel foucault_,
p136) it is where Foucault describes himself as a philosopher of the event.
(I am organising some stuff for a reading group on Foucault's concept of the
"event" (through Deleuze and others) and secondly on his eventalization
methodology as minor science of the archive.)
Ciao,
glen.
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.4/643 - Release Date: 1/21/2007 5:12 PM
I thank you for your reply. It is very useful indeed. He says somewhere else that he is not a philosopher (page 249 of the Ethics edited collection, I think. bad notes, sorry!!). Very odd. I wonder if this is Foucault being bashful under the burden of anticipated critique?
By "nietzschean thinker" do you mean in respect to his historical methodology as a "genealogical descent" or with regards to time (event vs eternity) do you mean a thinker of the untimely? I guess that is asking almost the same question twice...
What is remarkable is the use of 'scene' in the title of the piece. It is only superficial of course and entirely coincidental, but half my dissertation is organised around thinking about an event-based conception of the "scene" within a particular strand of popular culture. More in the concrescent sense of an event than in the discontinuous (structuralist) sense. I use it as a hinge to mediate between the historical events (in Foucault's sense of eventalization) and the contemporary present day sense of the scene (within which I insinuated myself through fieldwork).
Ciao,
glen.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Adriano" <oxanairda@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] DE 234 article?
Glen;
You are refering to "La scene de la philosophie", april 1978 (where M. Watanabe interviews Foucault) It is important to remark that F doesnot describes himself as a philosopher. As far as it is shown on the spanish translation, F says that his is interested in the event, not in eternity, and thats what doesnot make him a philosopher in the classic way, or maybe not even a philosopher at all, or a good philosopher. I think that this statement is rather diferent to say that he is putting himself as a philosopher, but that doesnot mean either that he is putting himself as something else than a nietzschean thinker. Those days F was very careful to take some margins about himself (i could bet that by that time he noticed that he was somehow sick) and other philosophers (to me it sounds that he was taking distance about Deleuze, but not in a combative way: on contrary, to say that D is not like hime, that he is really a philosopher -remarking that he (i mean F) is not"-, but
this sounds not as a "victim discourse", F ment that)
Cheers and forgive my broken english
adr
----- Mensaje original ----
De: Glen Fuller <gfuller1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Para: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Enviado: lunes, 22 de enero, 2007 20:06:04
Asunto: [Foucault-L] DE 234 article?
hi,
does anyone have the reference for the dits et ecrits publication #234? or
know if it has been translated into english? according to the 'event' entry
in the "key concepts" glosssary in clare's book (2005, _michel foucault_,
p136) it is where Foucault describes himself as a philosopher of the event.
(I am organising some stuff for a reading group on Foucault's concept of the
"event" (through Deleuze and others) and secondly on his eventalization
methodology as minor science of the archive.)
Ciao,
glen.
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list
__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.4/643 - Release Date: 1/21/2007 5:12 PM