don't forget there is an influential analytic reading of N's conception of truth (Clarke etc.).
________________________________
From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault, correspondence theory vs coherence theory
In view of Nietzsche's attitude towards the question of truth and
Foucault's inheritance of Nietzsche, there's no reason to think the
modernistic analytic tradition has anything to add.
erik
Op 06-04-11 08:31, Chetan Vemuri schreef:
> but of course "having" to answer with something only complicates the
> issue further :)
>
>
> On
>
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list
________________________________
From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault, correspondence theory vs coherence theory
In view of Nietzsche's attitude towards the question of truth and
Foucault's inheritance of Nietzsche, there's no reason to think the
modernistic analytic tradition has anything to add.
erik
Op 06-04-11 08:31, Chetan Vemuri schreef:
> but of course "having" to answer with something only complicates the
> issue further :)
>
>
> On
>
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list