I know that Brian Leiter has done some stuff on this matter but I
wasn't particularly fond of the results of his work. I feel he tends
to squeeze Nietzsche into too much of a scientific box, comprimising
his aesthetics, something Christoph Cox seems to agree with. Indeed,
the only real analytic engagement with "continental thought" that I've
read in depth happens to be with Nietzsche and much of that literature
seems to be concerned with "rescuing Nietzsche" from the
"postmoderns".
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Ali Rizvi <ali_m_rizvi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> don't forget there is an influential analytic reading of N's conception of truth (Clarke etc.).
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault, correspondence theory vs coherence theory
>
> In view of Nietzsche's attitude towards the question of truth and
> Foucault's inheritance of Nietzsche, there's no reason to think the
> modernistic analytic tradition has anything to add.
>
> erik
>
>
> Op 06-04-11 08:31, Chetan Vemuri schreef:
>> but of course "having" to answer with something only complicates the
>> issue further :)
>>
>>
>> On
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
--
Chetan Vemuri
West Des Moines, IA
aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
(319)-512-9318
"You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the world"
wasn't particularly fond of the results of his work. I feel he tends
to squeeze Nietzsche into too much of a scientific box, comprimising
his aesthetics, something Christoph Cox seems to agree with. Indeed,
the only real analytic engagement with "continental thought" that I've
read in depth happens to be with Nietzsche and much of that literature
seems to be concerned with "rescuing Nietzsche" from the
"postmoderns".
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Ali Rizvi <ali_m_rizvi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> don't forget there is an influential analytic reading of N's conception of truth (Clarke etc.).
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault, correspondence theory vs coherence theory
>
> In view of Nietzsche's attitude towards the question of truth and
> Foucault's inheritance of Nietzsche, there's no reason to think the
> modernistic analytic tradition has anything to add.
>
> erik
>
>
> Op 06-04-11 08:31, Chetan Vemuri schreef:
>> but of course "having" to answer with something only complicates the
>> issue further :)
>>
>>
>> On
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
--
Chetan Vemuri
West Des Moines, IA
aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
(319)-512-9318
"You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the world"