Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Debate between Genealogy and
Critical Theory (ed. by Samantha Ashenden and David Owen)
Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate (ed. by Michael
Kelly)
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Guillermo Vega <gui_vega@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I think that there is not a real debate between Habermas and Foucault.
> Anyway, you can find the central area of conflict in "The Philosophical
> Discourse of Modernity".
> Best,
>
> Guillermo
>
>
>
> 2011/9/28 David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > I have to agree with this!
> >
> >
> > On 28/09/2011, at 8:52 PM, ari wrote:
> >
> > > if you can't do that best not even try reading the stuff!
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:28:23 +0530, Amitranjan Basu wrote:
> > >> no one is providing the full citation so that i can search!
> > >>
> > >> On 28 September 2011 16:17, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I seem to remember that the little book 'Remarks on Marx' - later
> > >>> published
> > >>> in a different translation - had a lot in it on the critical
> > >>> theorists
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 28/09/2011, at 7:46 PM, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The best text of Foucault is the second part of his article The
> > >>> Subject
> > >>> and Power. There, he explicitly discusses his theory of
> > >>> power/politics as
> > >>> being different from Habermas'theory of communication.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> yours
> > >>>> machiel karskens
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Reno" <renomich@xxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:43:26 PM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> critique and power, subtitled, recasting the Foucault-Habermas
> > >>> debate,
> > >>>>> has many of the primary texts
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 9/27/2011 10:35 AM, ari wrote:
> > >>>>>> axel honneth 'critique of power' is a classic on this.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:30:24 +0100, Tee Dub wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Dear all,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I am in my fourth year at the University of Edinburgh and have
> > >>>>>>> decided to do my dissertation on Foucault and in particular the
> > >>>>>>> ‘debate’ that he had with Habermas over the term ‘power’. I am
> > >>> in
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> very early stages of the project and am in need of some advice.
> > >>>>> Would
> > >>>>>>> anyone be able to tell me what the central area of conflict
> > >>> between
> > >>>>>>> the two was and know where Foucault best outlines his opinion
> > >>> of
> > >>>>>>> power
> > >>>>>>> and where Habermas outlines his? Also are there any secondary
> > >>>>> sources
> > >>>>>>> that I may find useful?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Any help is much appreciated.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Terrence
> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
Critical Theory (ed. by Samantha Ashenden and David Owen)
Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate (ed. by Michael
Kelly)
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Guillermo Vega <gui_vega@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I think that there is not a real debate between Habermas and Foucault.
> Anyway, you can find the central area of conflict in "The Philosophical
> Discourse of Modernity".
> Best,
>
> Guillermo
>
>
>
> 2011/9/28 David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > I have to agree with this!
> >
> >
> > On 28/09/2011, at 8:52 PM, ari wrote:
> >
> > > if you can't do that best not even try reading the stuff!
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:28:23 +0530, Amitranjan Basu wrote:
> > >> no one is providing the full citation so that i can search!
> > >>
> > >> On 28 September 2011 16:17, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I seem to remember that the little book 'Remarks on Marx' - later
> > >>> published
> > >>> in a different translation - had a lot in it on the critical
> > >>> theorists
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 28/09/2011, at 7:46 PM, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The best text of Foucault is the second part of his article The
> > >>> Subject
> > >>> and Power. There, he explicitly discusses his theory of
> > >>> power/politics as
> > >>> being different from Habermas'theory of communication.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> yours
> > >>>> machiel karskens
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Reno" <renomich@xxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:43:26 PM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> critique and power, subtitled, recasting the Foucault-Habermas
> > >>> debate,
> > >>>>> has many of the primary texts
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 9/27/2011 10:35 AM, ari wrote:
> > >>>>>> axel honneth 'critique of power' is a classic on this.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:30:24 +0100, Tee Dub wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Dear all,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I am in my fourth year at the University of Edinburgh and have
> > >>>>>>> decided to do my dissertation on Foucault and in particular the
> > >>>>>>> ‘debate’ that he had with Habermas over the term ‘power’. I am
> > >>> in
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> very early stages of the project and am in need of some advice.
> > >>>>> Would
> > >>>>>>> anyone be able to tell me what the central area of conflict
> > >>> between
> > >>>>>>> the two was and know where Foucault best outlines his opinion
> > >>> of
> > >>>>>>> power
> > >>>>>>> and where Habermas outlines his? Also are there any secondary
> > >>>>> sources
> > >>>>>>> that I may find useful?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Any help is much appreciated.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Terrence
> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Foucault-L mailing list
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>