Yes, "core" is technical, and works within the context
of emailing to people, who subscribed to a specific
discussion group, which is located in the much wider
district, called "YahooGroups" ;-))))
Maybe you didnt wrote much about it, because the
"late" Foucault somehow changed since AK, and moved
away from this book, i dont know.
AK is result of "Madness and Civilisation", "Birth of
the clinic" and "Words and Things", but lately he
changed , I think. maybe thats why you dont pay much
attention to l'enonce.
but thank you for the response!
Regards!
Jivko
--- Stuart Elden <stuart.elden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jivko - couple of points. I wasn't trying to suggest
> it was not worthy of
> great attention, just that i said relatively little
> about it in the book.
> (as a side point, the book is about some aspects of
> the Heidegger/Foucault
> relation, and does not seek to be comprehensive at
> all).
>
> You might want to say a little about the 'core' of
> the notion, which seems
> to me to be a technical or formal type of statement,
> which would function
> within a given context and would need to be
> investigated within this
> logical, grammatical, discursive nexus. There's lots
> more to be said, and it
> would be interesting to relate it to aspects of the
> later Foucault, and the
> notion of dispositif for instance.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Stuart
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
of emailing to people, who subscribed to a specific
discussion group, which is located in the much wider
district, called "YahooGroups" ;-))))
Maybe you didnt wrote much about it, because the
"late" Foucault somehow changed since AK, and moved
away from this book, i dont know.
AK is result of "Madness and Civilisation", "Birth of
the clinic" and "Words and Things", but lately he
changed , I think. maybe thats why you dont pay much
attention to l'enonce.
but thank you for the response!
Regards!
Jivko
--- Stuart Elden <stuart.elden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jivko - couple of points. I wasn't trying to suggest
> it was not worthy of
> great attention, just that i said relatively little
> about it in the book.
> (as a side point, the book is about some aspects of
> the Heidegger/Foucault
> relation, and does not seek to be comprehensive at
> all).
>
> You might want to say a little about the 'core' of
> the notion, which seems
> to me to be a technical or formal type of statement,
> which would function
> within a given context and would need to be
> investigated within this
> logical, grammatical, discursive nexus. There's lots
> more to be said, and it
> would be interesting to relate it to aspects of the
> later Foucault, and the
> notion of dispositif for instance.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Stuart
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com