Re: Intro.

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P><BR><BR></P><BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>when is this b ird going to learn to speak english Jivko you are so wrong about EVERYThhing
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>.&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;that is verry precise said! "process that creates the
<DIV></DIV>&gt;institutions we are familiar with today". It does not
<DIV></DIV>&gt;implyes bynary system "positive-negative attitude".
<DIV></DIV>&gt;I have nothing more to add in this moment, so please
<DIV></DIV>&gt;excuse me!
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;--- Greg Seppi <WASISTAUFKUNG@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Well, personally I think that "using" Foucault
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; involves taking what analysis you want from
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Foucault's
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; writings and applying that analysis or
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; deconstruction
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; of myths to whatever struggle you happen to be
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; engaged
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; in.
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; I had a problem with Foucault's habits of being
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; non-to-specific when analyzing institutions, but I
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; think he clarifies his writings often enough to
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; allow
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; us to assert that his writings in DP are
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; prison-specific, but also allow us to view a process
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; that creates the institutions we are familiar with
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; today, or at least to trace the involvement of ideal
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; forms of punishment into the institutions of today.
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Like he says, if his analysis of the prison sounds
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; familiar in another institution, then perhaps
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; there's
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; a reason for that. If it can't, then there is
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; probably
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; a reason for that too.
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Questions? Comments? Reply!
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; -Greg
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; --- Jivko Georgiev <JIVKOX43GEORGIEV@xxxxxxxxx>
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; wrote:
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Your formulations are precise, but what you make
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; is
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; a
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; ascertion:"institutional 'forms' are embedded in
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; (historical) systems of knowledge and power?". An
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; ascertion is not negative attitude towards what it
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; ascerts. What Foucault makes is such ascertions,
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; that
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; is what i meant by "mere historical description".
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; I
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; guess You dont whant to say to the man, who posed
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; his
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; qouestion, that Foucault has negative attitude
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; towards
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; the shelters for homeless? He meant a complex of
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; historical research, followed by
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; generalizations(in
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; this formule im not too sure). But what realy was
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; that, what F. made? Was it
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; archeological/genealogical
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; research, or both research with generalizations?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; That
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; is a problem to me : How we should work with F.
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; writings? Should we search for generaliztions of
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; the
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; historical material, or somethinelse, which i cant
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; figure out it is?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Jivko
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; - that it is one and
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; would it be incorrect to say that the
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 'negativity'
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; inherent to Foucault's geneological project
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; derives
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; from the process of historicizing and
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; de-mythologicizing social institutions?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Would one be far off the mark in interpreting
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; this
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; process as a way of de-essentializing the
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; object/s
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; of enquiry in such a way as to show that
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; institutional 'forms' are embedded in
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; (historical)
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; systems of knowledge and power? - that it is one
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; and
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; the same force which leads to the generation of
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; languages of expression (discourse) and, on the
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; other hand, determines systems of monitoring and
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; control? - that institutions are invested with
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; interests of both liberation and repression?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Wouldn't describing Foucault's geneological
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; project
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; simply as 'an investigation of the history of a
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; practice' or 'a mere historical description of
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; practices' go directly against the thrust of his
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; project: ie to show that what portrays itself as
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 'innocent' curiosity is another form of
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; power-as-monitoring, that knowledge cannot be
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; separated from the subject who attains it, that
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; the
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; perspective one has the privilege to gaze from
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; is
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; intrinsically linked to the privilages
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; appropriated
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; by the gaze?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Wouldn't one be assimilating Foucault with all
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; those
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; and all that from which he wanted to distance
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; himself, if one were to neutralise his
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 'negativity',
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; or pessimism, by calling his analyses 'objective
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; historical investigations/descriptions'?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; caldon
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; __________________________________________________
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Do You Yahoo!?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; http://shopping.yahoo.com
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; __________________________________________________
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Do You Yahoo!?
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; http://shopping.yahoo.com
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;
<DIV></DIV>&gt;__________________________________________________
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Do You Yahoo!?
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
<DIV></DIV>&gt;http://shopping.yahoo.com
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>

Partial thread listing: