Changing subjects slightly: the relationship between Althusser and
Foucault has recently come to interest me. With the exception of the
(auto)biographies, I haven't been able to find a whole of published
material that covers either their personal relationship or their
intellectual relationship. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places...
I'm especially interested in how Foucault's shift to "analytic" is an
attempt to get around the science/ideology problem that Althusser's
"Theory of theoretical practice" generates. (If nothing else, there
are a lot of interesting parallel passages in their respective works on
these subjects.)
Slightly different again: is there anything to Miller's claim that one
of the major causes of the dissolution of Deleuze and Foucault's
friendship was the publication of HSI? Miller claims that Deleuze read
that book as an attack on Anti-Oedipus and responding to Foucault with
an extensive letter detailing his complaints. This claim is found on
page 297 in two short paragraphs and referenced in footnote 39
appearing on page 448 as coming from an anonymous source. Has this
letter ever been found or made public in any way?
On 4-Sep-04, at 12:43 PM, Mark Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi Clare,
>
> at one point I was responsible for a lot of the content on that
> Foucault page. The problem is that as people can edit it at will, the
> article keeps drifting into inaccuracies. Also, a lot of people
> disagree with me - had a big dispute with people there about
> Foucault's relationship to Althusser - it turned out ultimately that
> they were arguing on the basis of Foucault for Beginners. Anyway, I'll
> get round to tidying it up at some point again. Of course, if anyone
> else here wants to get involved adding or removing stuff, then that's
> what wikipedia is all about!
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>> From: "Clare O'Farrell" <panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Subject: wikipedia article on foucault
>
>> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:34:11 +1000
>
>>
>
>> Have people seen the Wikipedia article on Foucault?
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault
>
>>
>
>> Looking at the Wikipedia, I see that anyone at all can edit articles
>
>> which appear in the wikipedia - what a great concept! The article on
>
>> Foucault could do with a few edits... Anyone?
>
>> --
>
>
>
>> ************************************************
>
>> Clare O'Farrell
>
>> email: panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> website: http://www.foucault.qut.edu.au
>
>> ************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
> This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
>
> Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> text/html (html body -- converted)
> ---
Foucault has recently come to interest me. With the exception of the
(auto)biographies, I haven't been able to find a whole of published
material that covers either their personal relationship or their
intellectual relationship. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places...
I'm especially interested in how Foucault's shift to "analytic" is an
attempt to get around the science/ideology problem that Althusser's
"Theory of theoretical practice" generates. (If nothing else, there
are a lot of interesting parallel passages in their respective works on
these subjects.)
Slightly different again: is there anything to Miller's claim that one
of the major causes of the dissolution of Deleuze and Foucault's
friendship was the publication of HSI? Miller claims that Deleuze read
that book as an attack on Anti-Oedipus and responding to Foucault with
an extensive letter detailing his complaints. This claim is found on
page 297 in two short paragraphs and referenced in footnote 39
appearing on page 448 as coming from an anonymous source. Has this
letter ever been found or made public in any way?
On 4-Sep-04, at 12:43 PM, Mark Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi Clare,
>
> at one point I was responsible for a lot of the content on that
> Foucault page. The problem is that as people can edit it at will, the
> article keeps drifting into inaccuracies. Also, a lot of people
> disagree with me - had a big dispute with people there about
> Foucault's relationship to Althusser - it turned out ultimately that
> they were arguing on the basis of Foucault for Beginners. Anyway, I'll
> get round to tidying it up at some point again. Of course, if anyone
> else here wants to get involved adding or removing stuff, then that's
> what wikipedia is all about!
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>> From: "Clare O'Farrell" <panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Subject: wikipedia article on foucault
>
>> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:34:11 +1000
>
>>
>
>> Have people seen the Wikipedia article on Foucault?
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault
>
>>
>
>> Looking at the Wikipedia, I see that anyone at all can edit articles
>
>> which appear in the wikipedia - what a great concept! The article on
>
>> Foucault could do with a few edits... Anyone?
>
>> --
>
>
>
>> ************************************************
>
>> Clare O'Farrell
>
>> email: panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> website: http://www.foucault.qut.edu.au
>
>> ************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
> This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
>
> Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> text/html (html body -- converted)
> ---